Before borders: a legal and literary history of naturalization by Stephanie DeGooyer
Author
Faculty Advisor
Date
2024
Keywords
literary criticism, naturalization
Abstract (summary)
Let me begin with an unequivocal endorsement: anyone interested in the fields of novels studies or law and literature will find Before Borders deeply rewarding to read. It is historically rich, rigorously researched, and confidently polemical in ways I will elaborate below. But this monograph should be of interest to scholars, regardless of expertise, as a pedagogical document, one that expertly models the rhetorical move of the scholarly intervention, what we sometimes call the "so what?" question of research work. What begins, in the first chapter, as an exegesis of underexamined seventeenth-century juridical documents that reimagined political subjectivity following the Union of the English and Scottish Crowns quickly coalesces into a set of powerful claims that bear heavily on contemporary understandings of the novel, the nation, and the concept of naturalization in literary studies. Moving briskly between early modern legal theory (Blackstone, Locke, Bacon), canonical works of fiction (Richardson, Defoe, Burney, Mary Shelley), and contemporary criticism (Arendt, Barthes, Benedict Anderson, Jacques Rancière), Stephanie DeGooyer always keeps a keen eye on her study's high argumentative stakes.
Publication Information
Hollingshead, D. (2024). Before Borders: A Legal and Literary History of Naturalization by Stephanie DeGooyer. Eighteenth Century Fiction, 36(2), 352–356. https://doi.org/10.3138/ecf.36.2.352
Notes
Item Type
Article Post-Print
Language
Rights
All Rights Reserved
Permalink
Collections
Embargoed Until:
2025-03-20